California vs Montana: Population Density
California is more densely populated than Montana.
Visual Comparison
Difference: 234.1 per sq mi — California leads.
Related Context
Density in Context
Population density shapes commutes, housing costs, and the feel of daily life.
What This Means
California vs Montana: Population Density in context
California has a population density of 241.5 per sq mi, compared with 7.4 per sq mi in Montana — roughly 32.6× the Montana figure. Number of residents per square mile.
People Also Ask
California vs Montana Population Density — Common Questions
Q What is California's population density?
California's population density is 241.5 per sq mi.
Q What is Montana's population density?
Montana's population density is 7.4 per sq mi.
Q Which state has a higher population density — California or Montana?
California is more densely populated than Montana.
Q How much more population density does California have compared to Montana?
234.1 per sq mi.
More Comparisons: California vs Montana
Grouped tabs keep the deep-dive links tighter and easier to scan.
Explore Each State
Sources: Core demographic data comes from the 2020 U.S. Census, with land area from U.S. Census Bureau TIGER files. Income, housing, affordability, and tax fields are maintained in our comparison dataset; purchasing-power figures use BEA Regional Price Parities. Minimum wage data comes from the U.S. Department of Labor, gas prices from AAA, and electricity rates from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Political control and election fields use 2024 presidential results together with National Conference of State Legislatures data. Gun-law labels use the Giffords scorecard, alcohol system data comes from NABCA, and marijuana status uses NCSL's state cannabis laws tracker.